Hippy's Happy Film Review

Traffic




Details

USA 2001 147m

Director

Steven Soderbergh

Cast




Can I see your crack please ?


Soderbergh's documentary style offering is an excellent insight into the world of drugs on both sides of the Mexican border.

Mixing and inter-twining six separate viewpoints on the world of drugs, it gives a fantastic insight into the complexity of the drugs' issue whilst managing to steer well clear of patronising moralisation.

There are morals to be found, but they are presented matter of factly. Almost all aspects of the drug culture are observed from both sides of the fence; it is a film which neither takes sides, condemns nor applauds drugs. It tells it pretty much like it is.

Douglas plays an excellant part as Robert Wakefield, the newly appointed drug tzar. Determined to stamp out the flow of drugs over the border and get to the root of the problem.

His daughter, however, like many teenagers, is experimenting with drugs, like her mother beforehand, and is hooked on heroin and crack.

South of the border, the cartels exist in a corrupt state where the chief of police is coming down hard on one gang, to make sure that the gang he's being paid by win the spoils of the war.

North of the border we have the fine upstanding defenders of justice, on the street, fighting the daily slog to bring those involved in trafficking to justice and to convict the Mister Bigs of the underground.

Their equivalents on the South are trapped in the corruptness but are looking for a way out.

To round it all off, we have the American importers of the drugs. An everyday family whose buisinessman head has something to hide.

The story weaves between its threads in a strange meandering fashion but is well paced and tightly edited. The subtle, and not so subtle at times, hues give each strand of the story its own life and integrates the whole well.

The filming is particularly strange, and a little difficult to get to grips with if you've an eye for direction or film making. Shot in many places using hand-held cameras, the shots are deliberately wrong; shot too high, too low and slightly off centre from the action.

It is hard to get to grips with at first, but it does give the film its down to earth investigative documentary feel. Badly framed mid-to-long shots, with tops of heads cut off, show that all the no-no's of film school can be abandoned with glee when you're a master of your craft.

On the surface of this horrendously long, nearly two and a half hour, film, there would appear to be nothing new; drugs barons, drugs tzars, morally just plus corrupt police officers, with the addicts and their dealers stuck in the middle.

But it has a captivation which makes the time almost slip away. The characters are all deeply rooted and explored well. This isn't a film where any one person has a role and that role is it. There is real life and fire behind their eyes and their wholeness is explored in depth.

Doglas's inaugral speech as the new drug tzar is powerful and brilliant. One of the best performances he has delivered.

The situations are realistic, the settings equally so. As is the message.

Where others have tried to simplify the drugs battle as being between the good and the evil, this film goes beyond that, to show that nothing is ever black and white.

It has its set piece dialogues, from all its players, which taken at face value are monologues of justification for their role in the film. Combined, they provide a balanced perspective.

The only flaw in the screenplay is Zeta-Jones' transformation from happy, upper-middle class housewife to drug baroness. Such a speedy and efficient conversion clashed badly with the other, cleverly crafted sub-plots.

If Traffic can be accused of being skewed in anyway, it is in its subtle revelations that the drugs battle cannot be won by dogma and rhetoric. Government promises to wage war on drugs are effectively hollow, and do little to actually solve the problem.

This may appear to be a shocking claim to make, but it is undoubtedly true as more people turn to drugs, especially teenagers. Governments may throw more money and resources at stopping drugs, but they still keep getting through. People still keep taking them. The misery, for producers, suppliers and users continue.

In these terms, the film will make many people, who have taken the, "Drugs are bad. Just say no", mantra as their own, without exploring the subject in any more depth, perhaps think more deeply about the real problems.

The brief discourse on the effects of thousands of white folks descending on the black neighbourhoods to buy drugs, leading to the black folks seizing the opportunity to make their money that way, rather than pulling themselves up to the elevated social positions which they could undoubtedly achieve, may have given others a clearer understanding of the economics of the drug culture. It is not fair to say that the winners in this game are never the losers.

Whilst this film has a point to make, it doesn't make it by disregarding or curtailing other points of views. It is a full-bodied exploration of the world of drugs, and an extremely worthy piece of film making.





Site Navigation

  Home Page
  What's New
  Film Reviews
  Search
  Add Bookmark
  Have Your Say
  Guestbook



Ratings



First published on Wednesday the 14th of February, 2001 at 01:08:41
Last upload was on Tuesday the 10th of August, 2004 at 23:00:29