Hippy's Happy Film Review

Shrek 2




Details

USA 2004 95m

Directors

Andrew Adamson, Kelly Asbury, Conrad Vernon

Voices

Mike Myers, Eddie Murphy, Cameron Diaz, Julie Andrews, Antonio Banderas, John Cleese, Rupert Everett, Jennifer Saunders



In a land, Far Far Away ...
Now Donkey, we'll squeeze the Puss out of it ...


With the runaway success of Shrek it was no surprise that there was to be a follow up and Shrek 3 and 4 are already in the process of laboriously lumbering their way through the rendering machine.

Having wrapped Shrek up as a one-off standalone film, it is a challenge to take the story further, but the plot is reasonable enough, if somewhat thin; it's time to meet the parents. Princess Fiona's folks, the King and Queen of Far Far Away invite the happy couple over for a royal ball to celebrate their wedding.

Unfortunately, both expect their daughter to have married the gorgeously dashing Prince Charming, not the Jolly Green Giant himself. That the spell which locks Princess Fiona in her own Ogress appearance was not broken by a kiss from Prince Charming sits heavily on the King's shoulders and he embarks upon setting matters right.

Almost all of the plot can be gleaned or guessed at from watching a handful of television trailers heralding Shrek 2's arrival; Donkey becomes a graceful Mare having taken a potion, and it's pretty obvious that this magical potion would be used to some effect within the film upon Shrek and Princess Fiona, and unsurprisingly it is.

What is surprising is the film's sub-plot on racial tolerance which is very cleverly crafted and weaved into the narrative. That both choose to remain as Ogres rather than retain their human forms avoided a happy but somewhat staid and expected ending. Of course, doing anything different would have thrown the two main characters to the wind and potentially jeopardised the forthcoming sequels.

Although the plot is thin, it is hardly weak, and it is just one part of the film. The luscious animation is even better than in the original and there has been some absolutely amazing attention paid to detail, especially in facial expressions and lighting. Although there is still some way to go before an animated character passes as completely human, the time when that will arrive is getting closer. Small incremental improvements often go unnoticed, and it is only when you notice the stomach contouring of the Queen that you realise just how committed those involved in the effort to bring the characters to life have been.

There were a few cases where it appeared that the animation had been designed as a "Look what we can do" showcase - especially the puppy dog - but there were some spectacular set pieces well worthy of applause.

As in Shrek it is perhaps the background detail which makes the film so enjoyable. The occasional dig at Disney can be found, and modern day icons have been cleverly woven into the screenplay. That "Knights", a parody of Cops, managed to pull in a drugs reference without losing it's "U" ( Approved Viewing for All Ages ) rating, was interesting, and there was a subtle slipping of some minor swear words in to entertain the older audience while breezing over the heads of the youngsters.

My biggest complaint is over the re-hashing of musical numbers, mostly well known pop songs. Some were tolerably delivered, but much was weak, with Frou Frou's Holding Out For A Hero lacking intensity and vitality, the pitifully subdued, insepid reworking of Ever Fallen In Love by Pete Yorn even more so and entirely misplaced conceptually within the film, while, to me, Butterfly Boucher truly massacred Bowie's classic, Changes, although it appears that Bowie approved the version and even featured on the remake, so what do I know ?

If Shrek 2 is looking to grab the Oscar for best song, then the only outstanding musical offering was People Ain't No Good from Nick Cave and The Bad Seeds, and it got only background air play on screen. The soundtrack for Shrek got itself a Grammy Award; I suspect that for Shrek 2 is unlikely to, although some have nothing but praise for that which I hated. Maybe it's a 'generation thing' ?

It is fair to say that Shrek 2 is a masterpiece of animation technology, but it doesn't shine as brilliantly as the original. If the series falls victim to over commercialisation, marketing franchises and the like, then it will be a shame. The plethora of characters we are presented with in Shrek 2 is a marketing department's dream, and there is a slight taste left in the mouth that the series has become driven by financial motivation rather than for artistic achievement. The raft of Shrek related product advertising before the showing is testament to the value of what the marketing department have in their hands. It is a fine line between, iconic reference, product parody and product placement.

This time Shrek 2 survives; an animation classic, with voice actors who bring their characters to life, which pushes the less than exhilarating plot to the background. If DreamWorks can move it up a notch, giving us astounding animation, incredible plot and superb acting, then they will be on to a major winner. They did well, but they could do better.





Site Navigation

  Home Page
  What's New
  Film Reviews
  Search
  Add Bookmark
  Have Your Say
  Guestbook



Ratings



First published on Wednesday the 14th of July, 2004 at 00:59:09
Last upload was on Wednesday the 28th of July, 2004 at 19:16:59