Hippy's Happy Film Review

Elizabeth




Details

UK 1998 120m

Director

Shekhar Kapur

Cast

Cate Blanchett, Joseph Fiennes, Geoffrey Rush, John Gielgud, Richard Attenborough




Nice makeup; shame about the boat race


I didn't go and see Elizabeth when it was first released, I'm not a great fan of costume drama ( I'll be honest; I hate it ) and the trailer showed nothing at all which appealed to me; I wasn't expecting to enjoy it so I didn't bother going to see it.

Following its Oscar nominations, hearing very favourable comments from friends who had seen it the first time round and having been pleasantly surprised by Shakespeare In Love ( which I'd also had my, trailer induced, unfounded, concerns about ), I thought, okay, I'll give it the benefit of the doubt, when it resurfaced in a retrospective of Oscar nominated films at the local flea pit.

I really, really wish I hadn't bothered.

In my book, this has to be the most boring film which I have seen in an awfully long time, at the cinema or on television.

At least with TV you get the chance to change channels, go to bed early or do something else. Stuck in the cinema, with people relying on me to give them lifts back home, there was nothing left to do but stick it out, trying not to fall asleep.

I tried to enjoy it, I really did, but the film had almost zero impact on me; the fact that the most memorable thing I recall is some nice, high elevation shots, looking down over a large hall and, at times, thinking, well the costumes are quite well done, perhaps shows how unimpressed I was at the end of the day.

Even the appearance of Eric Cantona and some amusing lines failed to stir me.

It was a well put together film, everything was done right, the costumes were good, the plot reasonable, and even the dance scenes ( which seriously prejudiced my original view of the film in the trailer ) weren't that bad, but it just never exhibited any energy, it just dragged on slowly.

Kathy Burke showed a little promise but was more memorable for her blackened teeth than her part in the performance and Attenborough just looked totally out of place. Cantona was more of a pussy cat than a Vinney Jones.

To put it in a nutshell; I wasn't captivated. If I'd had a remote control; I would have been watching Teletext over the top of it.

The only feeling I had of willing suspension of disbelief was that the film had been nominated for so many Academy Awards.

I have to respect the views of my friends, who saw the film on its first release, who maintain it is an excellent film; they really do seem to have enjoyed it. For me though, there was no chemistry.

I found it dull and uninspiring, it dragged on for far too long, never really made any significant point and had no element of panache. By the time it finished, I was glad to see the back of it.

I've seen better, and more interesting, DIY and 'Life of the Shark' programmes on The Discovery Channel; perhaps I'm just not cut out for historical period pieces like this.

I never studied history at school because I found it boring and relatively unimportant; perhaps that's why I didn't enjoy the film - I found this film equally boring and unimportant.

Which is a real shame; I'd gone there with a more open mind than I normally would have and left considerable disappointed.

The trailer preceding its re-release is absolutely brilliant and makes the film look incredibly interesting and worthy of viewing.

Unfortunately, for me, the film didn't deliver what its trailer promised.





Associated Articles

  Shakespeare In Love



Site Navigation

  Home Page
  What's New
  Film Reviews
  Search
  Add Bookmark
  Have Your Say
  Guestbook



Ratings



First published sometime before Tuesday the 7th of December, 1999
Last upload was on Tuesday the 10th of August, 2004 at 23:00:29